Brent Cooper | May 13, 2006
The insurance industry plays an important role in natural disaster recovery. However, the effect of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the insurance industry—both in terms of cost and claims—will be felt for a long time to come. This first of three articles examines the effect of the hurricanes on rating and underwriting. Part 2 deals with the hurricanes' effect on claims handling procedures, and Part 3 discusses coverage disputes and pending litigation.
Hurricane Katrina crossed the Florida peninsula on August 25, 2005, as a Category 1 hurricane. Upon entering the Gulf of Mexico, it gathered energy from warm Gulf waters, producing a hurricane that eventually reached Category 5 status on Sunday, August 28, shortly before making its second mainland landfall just to the east of New Orleans on August 29. Immediately prior to landfall, Hurricane Katrina had weakened to a Category 4, and its eye passed just slightly to the east of New Orleans.
Despite the storm's slight weakening, the hurricane imposed unusually severe wind loads and storm surges (and waves) on the New Orleans region and its flood protection systems. The storm surge from Katrina caused catastrophic damage along the coastlines of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. Before Katrina, the most homes destroyed by any storm was 28,000, by Hurricane Andrew. 1 Hurricane Katrina destroyed more than 200,000 homes and is estimated to be responsible for $75 billion in damages, making it the costliest hurricane in United States history. 2
Katrina was also one of the deadliest storms since 1928, killing 1,417. As of January 18, 2006, more than 3,200 people remain unaccounted for, so the death toll may continue to grow.
Hurricane Rita came storming in September, making its approach near Cuba, striking Florida, and then Texas and Louisiana. The storm surge reopened some of the levee breaches caused by Hurricane Katrina a month earlier, and reflooded parts of New Orleans. However, Rita weakened significantly as she approached the coast, and the onshore damage was contained relative to Katrina.
Hurricane Rita killed 6 people and caused 113 indirect deaths. The property damage from Rita estimates around $9 billion, which makes Rita the ninth costliest storm in United States history.
The Louisiana Insurance Rating Commission reluctantly approved its first post-Katrina increase in homeowners insurance in January 2006. The commission voted 4 to 1 to allow ANPAC Louisiana Insurance Company to increase homeowners insurance rates by an average of 23.3 percent statewide.
Arguably, the increase in rates will not recoup the losses caused by Katrina, but may serve to stabilize the insurance market in those states most affected by the hurricanes. Still, even viability in the market seems insurmountable where it has been reported that the record $12.4 billion in claims from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in Louisiana alone is enough to wipe out all homeowners insurance premiums paid in the state over the past 25 years and all profits ever earned in Louisiana. Homeowners insurers in Mississippi are expected to pay $5.5 billion in claims from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, an amount equal to all homeowners insurance premiums paid in the state since 1989.
Other factors that weigh on the likelihood of increased premiums in the coastal states include the following.
While the climate seems ripe for increased premiums due to the increased losses caused by the hurricanes, several statistics indicate that the property/casualty insurance industry's profitability for 2005 is extraordinarily high. The industry apparently experienced an unexpected $6.3 billion increase in new capital. 4
The Louisiana Department of Insurance issued emergency rules prohibiting all insurance companies from canceling or nonrenewing policyholders in storm-impacted counties. 5 Rule 23 specifically suspends the right of any insurer to cancel or nonrenew property insurance covering a dwelling located in Louisiana that sustained damage as a result of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita until 60 days after the substantial completion of the repair and/or reconstruction of the property or until the Emergency Rule is terminated by the commissioner. This Emergency Rule specifically prohibits rate increases until January 1, 2006, on existing insurance and allows the insurer to offset the premium owed by the insured from any claim payment made to the insured under the policy, except as relates to health insurance.
Recently, the Louisiana Commissioner of Insurance issued Directive 196, 6 requiring insurers in Louisiana writing personal lines insurance to ignore all unfavorable credit score entries that are related to Hurricanes Katrina and/or Rita when considering the individual's credit history for underwriting or rating of personal lines insurance. Still, Louisiana homeowners can expect a significant increase in property insurance in 2006 to help bail out the LCPI plan and cover the emergency loans issued to cover all hurricane claims. 7
The Texas Department of Insurance issued several bulletins to address the potential rate and underwriting affects from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. These bulletins are listed as follows.
TDI explains that Bulletins 0044-05 and 0045-05 were written to address circumstances where the insured participates in temporary relief efforts, but where the insured's participation is more permanent causing "an increase in exposure that is the result of a sustained activity, insurers should use prudence in reevaluating the risk." 8
The bulletins are only in effect during the time period set out in the Governor's disaster proclamation, which was originally 30 days from September 20, 2005, but extended by the Governor of Texas another 30 days on October 20, 2005. 9
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.
Footnotes