Peter Polstein | December 1, 2002
It's important to cover all the potential areas of loss your firm faces, even if insurance is not available or affordable. Peter Polstein reviews coverage extensions you should consider.
Once again, I am gratified to have heard from a number of readers, in response to my article, "What Constitutes a Full Underwriting Submission." A number of readers have asked about coverage issues, as well as the theory that asking for coverage which underwriters may or may not grant might be an exercise in futility in this marketplace.
Attempting to cover all the potential areas of loss, irrespective of how diminished the possibility of claim may be, is never an act of futility, especially when the insured has that one loss that ends up being covered. As a final segment to the discussion of submissions, let's think about coverage specifications.
Preferred wording looks like this:
(Lead Named Insured), and all wholly owned and/or financially controlled entities as now or hereafter may be constituted, including any partnerships or joint ventures, where this coverage is required by exposure or written or oral contract.
Wording of this nature can be applied to commercial liability, commercial automobile, or umbrella insurance policies, but obviously, because of statutory constraints, would have to be modified for the workers compensation contract. Undoubtedly, the broadest you could have agreed to would be in the range of the following:
(Lead Named Insured), and all wholly owned and/or financially controlled entities as now or hereafter may be constituted, including partnerships and joint ventures where the Named Insured has financial control in excess of 51%.
As for coverage extensions, the following are suggestions by contract form.
Coverage under this Policy #________ shall be no less broad than all Terms and Conditions of the Underlying policies as listed below:
List the policies, coverage type, carrier and policy number.
Finally, be sure that you and your insured understand fully the difference between these two and whether they are applicable to coverage. Be sure that the terms are concurrent. If a deductible includes allocated expenses or excludes them, all contracts should do as well. Be sure that the client understands that self-insured retentions (SIRs) apply in almost every instance. Make them responsible for obtaining counsel, and in some cases, the insurer will name particular counsel for defense. Deductibles utilized on workers compensation contracts are quite different from SIRs, where in most every case, they will be a requirement that the insured file for self-insurance.
These are wonderful weapons in the fight to maintain reasonable premium levels. There have been lengthy articles, if not books, written on this subject if you want more details. It is imperative to simply understand the application and use of these weapons and their consequences.
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.
Footnotes