Rose Hall | July 12, 2024
Innovation is quite the buzzword lately—it seems everyone's trying to innovate everything. In the business world, innovation tends to call to mind the Silicon Valley startup entrepreneur with unicorn status just around the next corner. Hardly do we think of legacy corporations as innovative, and intrepreneurialism is such an obscure concept that its often flagged by spellcheck as a misspelling of entrepreneur.
However, I believe that intrepreneurialism has an important role in driving innovation and may even allow us to achieve more as a society through the influence our large corporates have. Of course, there are pros and cons to innovation in a startup versus a legacy organization, which we'll explore first, and then we'll discuss some key actions to help you start your own intrepreneurial journey.
Startups tend to get the innovative "street cred" because they dare to boldly go where no one has gone before. They start with a new idea and then bake in technical expertise, enthusiasm, fearlessness, agility, creativity, innovative culture, growth mindset, and—let's not forget—digitally native talent.
Founding a startup has glamour appeal, as if you're about to be the next Netflix, Tesla, or Waze. But the reality is that those are the outliers, and the majority fail their way to obscurity. Why? Mostly because they lack traits that legacy companies inherently have. Allow me to elaborate.
Startups initially have no financial stability or backing—most of them are bootstrapped or operating on the good graces of friends, family, and maybe a few brave private investors. This "no strings" funding model allows them utmost freedom in the beginning stages, and they can develop their "passion project" with few other obligations or distractions. However, eventually most startups will need to raise funding rounds to continue to innovate on their idea and achieve product-market fit, and those stakeholders' priorities may interfere with progress. The founders want the thing to work, while the backers want the thing to sell.
Additionally, innovation often fails many times (by necessity) before succeeding, which to the backers can seem lengthy and costly. Most legacy companies have the financial stability to withstand a few iterations of "failing to success" before hitting that home run.
This goes hand in hand with funding. The more independent a startup is, then the more agile the developers can be in their product development, which is a good thing because it allows fast iteration and speed to market. However, once they see some success, they'll need funding to expand. The further into the funding round a startup gets, then the more cooks are in the kitchen (so to speak), and the startup's initial agility becomes inversely proportional to the number of stakeholders involved. Legacy companies can maintain agility (as long as the culture supports it) because they are internally funded and resourced.
While data is the best way to measure, quantify, and achieve "success," the newer an innovative idea is then inherently the less volume and maturity of data there is to support its use case. Most legacy companies have a tremendous amount of data, although admittedly the quality and usability may be questionable due to poor data hygiene from legacy systems, but the data exists.
Suppose the solution works like a charm from a technical perspective, then the hard work begins for the startup to convince potential customers that their product is the solution to a prevalent problem. They'll need to nail product-market fit, pricing, exposure, competitive advantage, and more, while also overcoming the background noise that saturates the consumer market these days, such as fake news, scams, for-sale reviews, click bots, etc.
When no one's ever heard of your solution (or worse, they don't even recognize the problem you're solving), it's an uphill battle to educate the masses that (1) there is a problem to solve, (2) it's worth spending money to solve this problem, (3) you have a solution, and finally, (4) that your solution is better than everyone else's solution.
Legacy companies by their nature already have brand recognition and market traction. They even have what I would consider a captive audience (no pun intended for the insurance readers), meaning that their current clientele who already trust their brand and their products are likely to trust a new product more quickly from a known entity than an unknown one.
Legacy companies have their own challenges. They often struggle with innovation in many ways, including culture, hierarchy, motivation, momentum, sunk-cost bias, confirmation bias, and general "get off my lawn" mentality. Many decades' and centuries' old companies hinge their old-world thinking on the concept that whatever they've been doing for decades is what has made them successful and that to deviate from that would surely be catastrophic.
In fact, most high-level executives have achieved those roles by rinsing and repeating what the former executive did but maybe just a little better than the last occupant of that role. But let's face it: The light bulb was not invented by iterating on the candle.
So, if both have their pluses and minuses, what is the alternative? Intrepreneurialism is developing an innovative "startup" of sorts within a large legacy organization. Assuming the intrapreneurial team has the appropriate support (which we'll address later), they would arguably have the financial stability, funding sources, lots of data, and established brand recognition to start up a new, innovative idea and bring it to market quickly.
At AXA XL, we've partnered with many startups in our award-winning Ecosystem to bring to our clients the most innovative technologies that can help them improve their risk management and build a more sustainable and prosperous business. And we think innovation is for everyone, so here's how we did it.
Start a steering committee with a mix of senior leaders. Include some leaders who are already big believers in your project (for obvious reasons), some who are merely interested (aim to convert into believers), and—most importantly—remember to add some that are against it! The naysayers sometimes bring the most to the table as they are more likely to challenge in a constructive way rather than a combative way if they share ownership by being on the committee. Once you've brought them into the circle, there will be no one left to resist a full-scale launch once it's fully baked.
Develop a team of volunteer ambassadors who believe in your passion project and its mission. These are your innovators, first-movers, and disrupters within the organization; the ones who deliver their day job superbly and also are always looking for a side project to keep them intellectually stimulated. They will carry the momentum from all angles so that it permeates the organization and converts the next layer of on-the-fence colleagues into believers and ultimately into ambassadors.
The less senior colleagues can be even more influential than the senior leaders because they are closest to the clients and are the ones who have to believe in it to bring it to market. This organic growth can often be more effective in changing a culture than a top-down mandate. It provides colleagues with leadership opportunities, encourages cross-business collaboration, and ensures that the mission remains aligned with client needs and the market as it iterates.
They will pilot ideas with clients and bring valuable feedback and direction to the work. Also, give the group a cool name (e.g., "Ambassadors") that they can put in their email signature line, some company swag identifying their role, and formally recognize their participation and volunteerism to the senior leaders and the company at large. These seemingly small gestures of gratitude are well-deserved, go a long way with colleagues, and also drive the visibility for the project itself.
Don't be afraid to fail; in fact, you should expect to fail to reach success. The household product WD-40 was the fortieth iteration of an attempt to displace water and prevent rust on rockets. It was named as such: water displacement (WD) and 40th trial. I would contend that there hardly has ever been a successful innovation without finding thousands of ways something won't work. Look for it, expect it, and embrace it.
There's a very fine line between confidential intellectual capital and first-mover advantage (aka "stealth mode") and being so siloed that, by the time you go to market, the solution is irrelevant to the problem you're trying to solve or rendered obsolete by a competing product.
There are plenty of problems to solve in the world, and we're all better when we get there together. So, collaborate and share as much as possible with clients, peers, and market stakeholders to innovate the best solution possible. In 1959, Volvo shared its patent for the three-point seat belt because the Volvo executives felt that this life-saving invention was too important not to share. That's the type of societal good that comes from great innovation.
Can you think of a single company that has publicly announced, "We are the least innovative company you know!"? Nope, neither can I. This is because everyone wants to appear innovative. Notice that I said appear innovative, not be innovative. The truth is not every company is innovative, and that's okay. Just make sure that your words and your actions as an organization are aligned.
Change isn't hard; change management is hard. If you're trying to innovate in a company that says it's innovative, but you're hitting roadblocks at every turn, maybe that company is in need of an innovation self-audit and identity calibration.
A few weeks ago, I saw a treadmill for sale on the Facebook Marketplace. The caption read, "Brand new treadmill for sale. We bought this for the people we wanted to be, not the people we are." That's some sobering self-awareness that we could learn a lesson from.
We would not be inventing electric cars, flying to Mars, inventing vaccines for new viruses in a matter of months, and otherwise progressing as a society without innovation, and it's everyone's responsibility. Although the insurance industry is often regarded as slow to change and less innovative than some other industries, we are truly the backbone of innovation by providing the financial safety net that allows innovative companies to fail their way to success.
If every entrepreneur had to put their entire balance sheet on the line with every experiment, no one would ever experiment—and we need constant experimentation to progress. Circularly, to keep up with the risks associated with innovative experimentation, we as an insurance industry must innovate our way of thinking to provide the products and services that protect what matters to the most innovative minds: allowing them to do what they do best.
We can surely revel in the glamour of the Silicon Valley startup while we're all attached to our iPhones and Teslas, but in the end, I think it's insurance that's really bringing sexy back.
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.