Cheri Hanes | July 3, 2021
Over the last few years, the phrase "continuous subcontractor qualification" (CSQ) has emerged. The idea is that, rather than focusing on a one-time or annual "prequalification" of subcontractors, the construction industry would be better served to focus on maintaining awareness of the factors affecting subcontractors and how they are managing them. This approach is well-suited to the conditions in which we find ourselves today.
"Prequalification" has an implication of being a one-time activity, but to adequately address evolving risks, a more robust approach is needed. Strong sub management today demands an ongoing refreshing of qualification information to capture emerging subcontractor and market challenges. Prequalification simply cannot account for the dynamic nature of the construction industry—or the unknowns associated with it. Things change from project to project, and even over the course of a project, which affect project success and profitability. An 18-month-old prequalification cannot help your project teams manage these emerging exposures. CSQ can.
This article focuses on the conditions that require ongoing attention in the current environment, including subcontractors' internal changes, supply chain and escalation challenges, and changing project requirements. We'll also look at how a CSQ mindset can help address them.
While many of the impacts of COVID-19 appear to be receding, it is critical to understand how subcontractors have fared over the prior period, how they have adapted their business plan, and risks that may still be emerging. The following are potential challenges to consider.
The crucial message here is that builders should not rely on past experience with subcontractors. Updated internal and external references, a fresh look at workforce and finances, and direct questions about business plans are called for to develop and maintain your understanding.
Supply chain and cost escalation are on everyone's minds today. Qualification processes, though, seldom include a formal approach to understanding these risks. This is a missed opportunity. The industry has dealt with similar challenges before, and we can usually point to specific causes of the situations. In contrast, impacts today are coming from all sides. They are related to COVID-19, Winter Storm Uri, capacity challenges in ports, labor shortages, etc. This results in today's escalation risks being harder to predict.
CSQ is an opportunity to seek out and directly address these issues. How? By asking the questions, working collaboratively, and understanding the ability of subcontractors to bear the risks being pushed down to them.
The industry is seeing increasing movement to technology, sustainable materials, and other "new" systems and requirements, yet few qualification processes address these factors. Ask these questions. Issues such as disputes over responsibilities, unanticipated change orders, or even defaults of performance can be circumvented with intentional focus early on about these special requirements. Don't wait until interviews or bid leveling to have the discussion. By that stage, procurement teams may be tempted to rely on a low number from a subcontractor that will ultimately struggle to perform given new requirements.
Above are a few of the challenges your qualification process should be addressing today. To truly add value, the process must continuously evolve. The road map to powering this process includes assigning resources, getting the right information at the right times, training internal teams, process improvements, and constant communication.
The continuous subcontractor qualification approach allows you to keep your approach relevant and your information fresh. The heart of the CSQ approach is a commitment to taking an ongoing, holistic look at the situation, using all available information to drive the best discussions, and then actively monitoring the work to proactively adjust when needed, which in turn drives the success of all partners!
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.