Jerry Miccolis | May 1, 2002
Jerry Miccolis summarizes the terminology common to companies that practice ERM, which forms a large part the emerging global "language of risk."
One of the worthy goals of enterprise risk management (ERM) is the establishment of a common risk vernacular throughout the organization. This article summarizes the terminology that is coming into common usage among companies that practice ERM, forming a large part the emerging global "language of risk".
An important aspect of ERM is the strong linkage between measures of risk and measures of overall organizational performance. Thus, this glossary begins with a description of some key corporate performance measures, after which successive elements of the ERM process (risk assessment, measurement, modeling, management applications, monitoring, and oversight) are described.
As in prior articles in this series, we focus on publicly traded corporations, and where industry-specific details are introduced, we focus on the financial services industry (and, more specifically, the insurance industry) for illustration. Where appropriate, certain terms are compared and contrasted; and where some terms represent alternative approaches to a similar issue, relative strengths and weaknesses are discussed.
Risk Measurement
Risk modeling refers to the methods by which the risk and performance measures described above are determined.
Note: As a practical matter, the choice of modeling approach is typically between statistical analytic models and structural simulation models.
Contrast between Modeling Approaches | |||
---|---|---|---|
Representation of Relationships | Calculation Technique | Examples | Relative Advantages |
Statistical (based on observed statistical qualities without regard to cause/effect) | Analytic (closed-form formula solutions) |
|
Simplicity, speed, use of publicly available data (well suited for industry oversight bodies) |
Structural (based on specified cause/effect linkages; statistical qualities are outputs, not inputs) | Simulation (solutions derived from repeated "draws" from the distribution) |
|
Flexibility, realism, accuracy, ability to examine scenario drivers (well suited for individual companies) |
All of these techniques, models, and measures are used in various combinations to assist management decision-making.
There are a number of regulatory, rating agency and corporate governance guidelines and regulations that ERM programs and policies need to consider. The more prominent of these are identified and categorized below.
Certain of these definitions were adapted from The Dictionary of Financial Risk Management, by Gastineau and Kritzman, 1996, Frank J. Fabozzi Associates.
Additional details on the concepts covered in this article, as well as in other articles in this series, were found in the monographs Enterprise Risk Management: An Analytic Approach and RiskValueInsights™: Creating Value Through Enterprise Risk Management—A Practical Approach for the Insurance Industry 2002 from from Tillinghast - Towers Perrin.
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.